Yzabel / October 29, 2005

In The Pursuit Of A RSS Reader

I’m posting this entry from Flock, just to test the blog function in it. Believe it or not, I hadn’t done that yet (although I’d say the only real interest with it for the moment would be to get the WordPress.com account, if there’s still someone around who hasn’t gotten one). So far, things seem to work well, except that… “where are my categories?!” I wonder if I’ll be able to pick one later on. Hmm.

The other new of the moment is that I think I’ve finally set on a non-web RSS feeds reader. To be honest, SharpReader and FeedDemon, as hyped as they are, don’t cut it for me. I don’t know why, perhaps it’s a question of looks, of “feeling” with them. A software can be extremely powerful, if I don’t have the right feeling with it (and this has nothing to do with “looking like an OS X interface” or anything of the same kind), I won’t be at ease with it. Alright, I also didn’t want to settle down with something I needed to pay, I admit; there are way enough pieces of software I’ve paid for, and I’m starting to grow broke.

Thus, I’ve been using RSS Reader since the beginning of the week, and it seems to do the job well enough for me (BottomFeeder was nice, but getting on my nerves, with some new posts it’d pick ten times a day and crashing every hour or so). It’s also been able to read feeds that BottomFeeder couldn’t; don’t ask me why, I just know it couldn’t. The only not-so-funny thing is that there hasn’t been any newer version in the past months. However, I don’t know if this is really a problem per se.

I think I’ve pretty much toured enough readers as of now. I’ll still keep an eye open, though.

EDIT: Indeed, no way of choosing categories. Argh.blogging, flock, rss, rss+reader

Yzabel / October 26, 2005

A Little Tool To Backup A LiveJournal Blog

What I’m going to point at today is LJ Book.I’ve discovered it earlier on this morning, and thought it’d be interesting to share it. While one of the aims of this tool is to generate a PDF of all the posts on a LiveJournal blog (in order for the blog owner to publish it using LuLu or another POD service), another one is the backup of one’s posts. Yes, I do have a small blog on LJ, that I really use for personal purposes only, and it’s good to have a trace somewhere of what I’ve written, in case it someday disappears—which will surely happen sooner or later: nothing on the Internet is truly immortal.If you’re anything like me, you probably dislike not having this level of control on your own words/webpages. With WordPress or any system that you host on your website, it’s of course easy to backup the database, but what about LJ or other services that don’t offer this function? No more worrying or saving the HTML pages one by one! The output isn’t schmancy-fancy nor full of user pictures and colors, but the text is safe, and it’s what matters.backup, blogging, livejournal, PDF, POD, writing

Yzabel / October 21, 2005

Install Flock And Get A WordPress.com Account

Via Blogging Pro: if you go to the WordPress.com page, you’ll see the following message: “Want WordPress.com? Then download Flock”. The necessary link to do so is provided, but just for the record, here’s where to find the download page directly. Once you have installed Flock, just click “Getting Started”, right under the standard navigation buttons, and choose “Get yourself a blog”. There, you’ll have access to the WordPress.com, which will take you to asignup page.Read More

Yzabel / September 11, 2005

The Web Nostalgia

Currently perusing and comparing webhosting services, I went off a tangent in my head about how my perception of the internet has evolved since I started using it…I’m not one of the early children of the web, but I’m not too new to it either. My first contact with it was in 1997, when our teacher in Applied English class decided that we had to be open to the world, and dragged us at the school library for a few sessions on the computers. From 1997 to 1999, I went on accessing websites sporadically from college computers, when I had some time to surf; my main researches at the time were on the Sefer Yetzirah, the Book of Enoch, and websites related to Mage: The Ascension, so my use of the internet was a very basic one. Later on in 1999, the friend who was to become my boyfriend convinced me to take an e-mail address at the university, which I did: I had discovered the joys of e-mailing! From there, my horizons expanded, and by year 2000, I would access the web everyday, or almost.I suppose that all of us who went to gradually use this tool had our little lightbulb moments, as well as stupid beliefs on which we stood corrected later on. Here are some of the things I remember, mainly from these 1997-1999 years. In a way, it’s very funny:Read More

Yzabel / September 6, 2005

Wondering about Webhosts

The need to write is constantly growing in me, and I’ve been pondering working on one or two more sites, preferrably blogs. Nothing’s sure yet… simply, ideas are boiling more and more, and I need to let them out somehow. I know I could take some kind of free account at Blog*Spot or similar services, but let’s be honest: I’m used to having “my” hosting and “my” domain names now, and this kind of services usually don’t fit my needs anymore.While I’m very happy with Paradygma (I know, I need to update it!), it’s starting to get a little cramped in there, and I found myself considering other webhosts, more adapted to my needs, preferably not expensive. I’m just hesitant, given that I’ve worked with one host only so far.Read More

Yzabel / August 13, 2005

Meta Tags Analyzer

A little useful tool, for those who don’t mind slightly dabbling with HTML coding: a meta-tags analyzer.While meta-tags are not “the” thing anymore when it comes to SEO (search-engine optimization), they’re still quite useful when it comes to getting properly indexed by search-engine spiders, and making sure that the ones on your webpage are up-to-date and appropriate can never hurt. At least, running my sites through it has pointed a few flaws to me, that I can now correct.html, metatags, seo

Yzabel / August 9, 2005

The Abstracts Site: Shvoong.com

I stumbled upon this site after following an ad. Yes, sometimes I click on AdSense banners; somewhere in the world, maybe some blogger has been cheered up by my click appearing in their reports. Anyway—I gave a try to Shvoong.com, more out of curiosity than of real hopes to make money through it, I admit.So, what is Shvoong? Behind this word is a multi-language online database containing abstracts about books, ideas and concepts (said abstracts being written by the members themselves, who can earn money each time they’re read). The idea behind it is to provide summaries on the most topics possible, so that visitors can quickly have access to them. It’s not meant to provide full information, only summaries (usually in about 300, 600 or 900 words). Readers also have the opportunity to rate the abstracts; the better rated an abstract is, the better it brings money to its author. Probably this wouldn’t be much money, of course, unless one writes ten or twenty abstracts a day, perhaps.The concept is nice. Whether it really works or not, this is another matter, but it’s nice regardless.abstract, shvoong, writing

Yzabel / August 2, 2005

Regender The Web

Found through Badgerbag, here’s a an amusing tool written by Ka-Ping Yee of wolog.net:

Regender filters the web & remaps gendered terms. He swaps with she, woman with man, and – best – Michael with Michelle. It’s surreal to read the New York Times front page when all the reporters and subjects of reporting are women. (Or have even the thinnest veneer of womanhood: a name.) It’s surreal to realize how surreal it is. Though I’m one of the rantiest feminists around, and I think a lot about it, it still jolted me to realize just how much of the world is about men, run by men, and reported by men. I don’t even NOTICE. It goes under the radar. It’s “normal”. Ping’s tool de-normalizes patriarchy. Coming up against my own sexism — because not noticing the imbalance is sexist, make no mistake – is tough and disturbing.

Amusing, and also giving a lot to think at times, when finally noticing how much “rewriting” a whole site can make its content look suddenly so very different in meaning. I’ve tried it on a few pages, from this very blog to online newspapers, and some of the results indeed end up being almost surreal (changes applied to names are part of making it so, I think—especially when seeing “Frank Inter” instead of “France Inter” in one of my own posts, and frantically searchingthe Edit button before realizing it wasn’t a typo on my part). It would probably have even more of an impact if I were to use it to browse my regular sites during a week or so, perhaps confusing my brain, perhaps opening my perceptions some more, who knows?An example of what Regender can do? Here’s an excerpt of a regendered post at Burningbird:

“Elwell informed his boss in Anthony of 2004 about being pregnant with quadruplets, and that he wouldn’t be able to travel for some weeks because of complications. His boss, Tina Armstrong, showed him a chart of the organization with his name removed in Mark, saying that he was being removed from the position because he couldn’t travel. She offered another position in operations, which he considered a demotion. He countered with a request for the East Coast sales director position, which meant he could continue in his field of interest, sales, and be able to travel for his job, because he could take trains or drive.”

An interesting shift of perception on the world, isn’t it?

Yzabel / July 27, 2005

Simulating Color Blind Vision

I had first spotted a link to this website on Bombast.org, so later on, I went and checked it for myself for a little longer than just clicking and having a quick look. The website is called Vischeck, and provides interesting information about color blindness, as well as examples and a page to check how your website will appear.

Roughly 1 in 20 people have some sort of color vision deficiency. The world looks different to these people: they often find it hard to tell red and green things apart. This often means that they sometimes can’t see things that ‘color normal’ people can see.Many pictures, documents and web pages are hard for color blind people to read because the people who designed them didn’t think about the problem. Vischeck lets them check their work for color blind visibility. It is also interesting to anyone who is just plain curious about what the world looks like if you’re color blind.

This may not seem more than a curiosity; however, for a graphic-designer or for anyone who dabbles in web-design and wants to obtain the most accuracy possible when it comes to displaying a site, this is a “detail” that not many people usually take into account.(All in all, once tested through Vischeck, this blog remains readable. It’s a good beginning, I think.)