Of Noticing Details When Not Supposed To
This thought hit me yesterday, while watching an episode of Monk, and this is probably why I’m going to link this to mystery novels and other kinds of “investigation” stories. How noticeable is a detail for an untrained person? To which extent can we consider that our characters are able to notice certain types of details more than other types? Of course, there’s a difference to be made here between knowledge learnt from books/school, knowledge learnt from experience/training/practice, and knowledge that one can happen to have because they stumbled upon it at some point in their lives, without their career and social/familial situation explaining it. The latter is always the one that is the trickiest for me: what is acceptable, and what is just a deus ex machina mechanism chosen by the author as a convenient solution?Read More
It’s only today that I’ve discovered this site, which is still in it beta version, but looks pretty interesting all the same:
I probably mentioned this in passing a few times here: shall I go on with writing “depending on my inspiration”, or adopting a more thorough way of planning? I was never sure of what method would be best for me. Would I need to plan carefully, or just run with the inspiration? After a few weeks of trying to change my ways of doing, I’ve started to wonder if, in this like in many other aspects of my life and work, it’s not the middle ground that would work best. And recently, it occurred to me that the problem for me exists in two forms: I don’t need outlining for a short story, but I sure do for a novel.
Due to having gotten up way too early for my own sake this morning, yet not being fresh enough to properly work on my NaNovel, I was sifting through my “How to…” book by Orson Scott Card again, and this is when I realized that he had at some point written something that sounded true: in works of sci-fi and fantasy, the way many authors depict the worlds they have created isn’t the same as the way an author in other kinds of fiction would do. Or, should I say, us readers don’t interpret it the classical way, and tend to read between the lines, perhaps.