Yzabel / January 9, 2006
A Newbie’s Guide To Publishing is a blog I follow at regular intervals, and a few days ago, its author, Joe Konrath, has posted an entry regarding his experience in being a judge in a short story contest. In his own words: “I can tell within ten seconds of looking at a story whether it will go on to the finals or not”. He then proceeds to list eleven points that will ensure a story, not to be published, but to go on the junk pile from the start. Of course, this is as usual a matter of perspective, and not every editor/judge/critic will proceed the same way; on the other hand, these points seem quite valid in my opinion, even if I know very well that following them all faithfully isn’t all there is to a good story.
The article is up on Joe Konrath’s blog. Here’s a summary of the points he lists (in fact, a general rule would be: “Present your story well, to at least show that you respect it”):
- Chosing the wrong font: no fantasy fonts, let’s pick something that goes easy on the eyes of a person who’s had to read many other stories before yours.
- Paper: cheap paper always speaks ill of your story.
- Ink: bad printing also speaks ill of a story.
- Spacing, and lack thereof: nobody wants to read 30-lines paragraphs.
- Typos: not proof-reading one’s own work is a sure way to tell “don’t take me seriously”.
- First sentence: especially in the case of short stories, it needs to draw the reader in from the start.
- Dialog: lack of dialog often means “all tell, no show”. Not always, but often.
- Ending: if the story is strong enough to be read, its ending must be even stronger.
- Conflict: stuff needs to happen, and better early than late.
- Avoid autobiographical stories: only known people stand a chance to see their memoirs being read. If we take part in short stories contests, chances are we’re not known, therefore not interesting enough to tell our lives.
- Adjectives and Adverbs, Exclamation Points, Repeating the same words, using the passive ‘was’ a lot, onomatopoeia, dialects, a first paragraph of nothing but setting, explanations, preaching, and anecdotes. Avoid like the plague.
Comments
Jennifer
INteresting. I have to say I might have a chance of passing the first round, since it seems from that list I do not commit the sins mentioned :)I do know though that I have to work on introducing my conflict earlier in my stories. I tend to drag the beginning out too long. I’ve been working on fixing that though :)Thanks for sharing.
fredcq
This is a great article. I was relieved that none of these points came as a surprise to me. I am always a bit terrfied to read stuff like this because these articles tend to make me want to go back and rewrite everything. This article was a great refresher. I have passed it on to other writers that I know.
Yzabel
I must admit, I was sort of relieved as well to realize that I already take my writing ‘seriously’ enough to not print on crumpled paper and the likes. At least, once we knew such implicit rules, we can focus on the writing, and not wory about these ‘petty’ matters 😉
Benjamin Solah
I knew most of them, except for the bit about starting half way down the page.