Yzabel / September 30, 2013

Review: Quin’s Shanghai Circus

Quin's Shanghai CircusQuin’s Shanghai Circus by Edward Whittemore

My rating: [rating=4]

Summary:

Quin, born in China and raised in the Bronx, is orphaned in the closing days of the Second World War when his parents go missing and are presumed dead in Shanghai. Years later, in a Bronx bar, Quin encounters a stranger who hints that he can uncover the secrets of his past by accompanying Big Gobi, an adult orphan too simpleminded to travel alone, on a journey to meet his guardian in Tokyo. Quin arrives in Japan determined to uncover the truth about his parents’ past, but his search soon raises more questions than answers. What are the connections between a Russian anarchist, a one-eyed baron who is head of the Japanese secret service known as the Kempeitai, and the atrocities committed during the rape of Nanking? And what does any of it have to do with Quin’s parents?

Part espionage novel and part surreal fantasy, Quin’s Shanghai Circus, the first novel by Edward Whittemore, is a remarkable and audacious literary feat. Alive with a fascinating cast of characters and equally enthralling turns of events, former CIA officer Whittemore offers readers a mesmerizing glimpse at a secret history of the twentieth century.

Review:

(I got an ebook copy from the publisher through NetGalley, in exchange for an honest review.)

This book was a pretty weird one, in that I couldn’t honestly tell at first whether I was liking it or not, nor where it was going. At the same time, those very impressions (or lackthereof) may be what contributed to my appreciating it in the end, as paradoxical as it sounds. Reading it, seeing the story unfold, was like working on a jigsaw puzzle whose final picture I didn’t know, yet wanted to see no matter what. I always found myself coming back to my tablet to get to the next chapter.

It’s probably not a novel for just everyone. Some of the themes it deals with expose all the crass of human nature, through conflict between Japan and China and severe misdeeds from some characters(rape, murder, mutilation…), and such scenes are often depicted in a graphic enough way to be considered as disgusting. I admit those weren’t my favourite parts.

On the other hand, what I found fascinating were the relationships fitting within each other. This is basically what the novel is about: relationships above everything else, how they got shaped through events, what led to certain people to work together or become friends or lovers… The characters often had features that made them unforgettable, even bigger than life—something that may not have been convincing in another story, but felt somehow oddly logical and normal here.

“Quin’s Shanghai Circus” is definitely a strange book, sometimes disturbing, sometimes shedding light, on the contrary, on what’s still good in humans. “Read at your own risk”, I’d say.

Yzabel / August 3, 2013

Review: King Arthur

King ArthurKing Arthur by Daniel Mersey

My rating: [rating=3]

Summary:

Despite his enduring popularity, King Arthur remains the most enigmatic of Britain’s legendary heroes. In this new book, author Dan Mersey retells the great stories of Arthur, while exploring the different facets of Arthurian myth, from the numerous, conflicting theories of his historical origin, through the tales of Welsh folklore and Medieval romance, and concluding with an examination of his various portrayals in the modern media. Presented with both classic and newly commissioned artwork, this book is an easy-to-read, yet highly detailed introduction to the complex body of myth and legend that surrounds Britain’s greatest hero.

Review:

(I received this book from NetGalley, in exchange for an honest review.)

One thing I can’t deny “King Arthur” is how well-presented and beautiful the book is. Even though I only had the PDF version, I could see that the paper version must be quite nice to have in one’s hands.

The book offers a summary of the traditional, literary Arthurian corpus, then focuses more on what mught have been actual historical sources. In itself, it’s pretty short, but said corpus is so wide anyway that I think we have to take this book as an introduction and an invitation to check out facts and fiction by ourselves.

If anything, though, I found the first part to be somewhat paradoxical: it would be a good introduction for newcomers to the Arthurian legends, yet at the same time, the author glosses over those a little too fast for a real newcomer to get everything in.

Yzabel / December 17, 2012

Review: The Pillars of the Earth

The Pillars of the EarthThe Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett

My rating: [rating=3]

Summary:

As a new age dawns in England’s twelfth century, the building of a mighty Gothic cathedral sets the stage for a story of intrigue and power, revenge and betrayal. It is in this rich tapestry, where kings and queens are corrupt – and one majestic creation will bond them forever.

Review:

I liked this book enough to want to read on and know what would happen next: even though some of it was predictable, it was kind of a given that reversals of fortunes and new developments would be part of it, and that was something I wanted to read at the moment, so it was alright with me. (Perhaps I wouldn’t have enjoyed it in other circumstances, though.)

The architectural descriptions were accurate enough; I didn’t know that much about cathedrals in that regard, and so I managed to learn a few things in the process. Also, there was a scene that happened in the town I currently live in, and I’ve always had a soft spot for cameos, not to mention that this one was unexpected (at least until the last third of the book).

I’m not giving it more than 3 stars, though, because mostly the characters weren’t that exceptional. I wanted to know more about what would happen to them, sure, and I partly felt connected to them, but nothing more. The ‘good guys’ sometimes did things that weren’t so good (for instance, what Jack did in the first Kingsbridge church), and this helped in making them appear a little less unidimensional. ‘A little less’ being the keyword here. The ‘bad guys’ were really bad, perhaps a little too much—in spite of Philip’s claims, Waleran struck me as greedy for power, period, not as a ‘genuine man of God’ who only took his duties so much to heart that any means to an end would do.

The other reason is the book’s length. I would’ve knocked a good 200 pages off it without blinking. After the first 600 pages or so, I started growing a little impatient, and wanted the twists and turns to stop and the plotlines to be resolved at last. (Good point, though, in that they all are; some readers may find fault in how conveniently everything gets tied together, but on the other hand, there’s nothing left hanging, and this can be a positive aspect too.)